For a disk rotating in a laminar fluid, calculate the torque from the viscous boundary layer and then nondimensionalize it as a moment coefficient. For a disk wetted on both sides, the theoretical relationship is
[ c_M=\frac{3.87}{\sqrt{\mathrm{Re}}} ]
provided that
[ \mathrm{Re}=\frac{R^2\omega}{\nu}<3\times10^5. ]
Here, (R) is the disk radius, (\omega) is angular velocity, (\nu) is kinematic viscosity, and (c_M) is defined by (c_M=2M/(\rho\omega^2R^5)).
The central method is to evaluate the rotational Reynolds number, use the laminar-disk correlation (c_M=3.87/\sqrt{\mathrm{Re}}), and recover the driving torque from (M=c_M\rho\omega^2R^5/2). The resulting mechanical power is (P=M\omega), subject to corrections when the flow becomes transitional or turbulent.
Establish the Operating Regime
Calculate the Rotational Reynolds Number
The first step is to determine whether the disk operates within the theoretical laminar range:
[ \mathrm{Re}=\frac{R^2\omega}{\nu}. ]
The variables must use a consistent unit system. For example, (R) should be in metres, (\omega) in radians per second, and (\nu) in square metres per second.
Check the Laminar Limit
For the stated disk solution, the laminar correlation applies when
[ \mathrm{Re}<3\times10^5. ]
This criterion is specific to the rotating-disk flow model. It should not be confused with the standard Reynolds-number limits used for flow through circular pipes or other conduits.
Calculate the Moment Coefficient
Use the Two-Sided Disk Correlation
For a disk wetted on both sides, calculate the dimensionless moment coefficient from
[ \boxed{c_M=\frac{3.87}{\sqrt{\mathrm{Re}}}}. ]
The coefficient decreases as the rotational Reynolds number increases within the laminar regime because viscous torque grows more slowly than the reference scale (\rho\omega^2R^5).
Define the Coefficient Consistently
The moment coefficient is defined as
[ \boxed{c_M=\frac{2M}{\rho\omega^2R^5}}, ]
where:
- (M) is the total driving torque on the disk,
- (\rho) is fluid density,
- (\omega) is angular velocity,
- (R) is disk radius.
The factor of 2 is part of the stated convention. Other sources may define rotating-disk moment coefficients differently, so the definition must be checked before comparing correlations.
Recover the Torque
Calculate Total Torque
Once (c_M) is known, rearrange its definition:
[ \boxed{M=\frac{c_M\rho\omega^2R^5}{2}}. ]
Substituting the laminar correlation gives
[ M
\frac{3.87}{2} \frac{\rho\omega^2R^5}{\sqrt{\mathrm{Re}}}. ]
Because
[ \sqrt{\mathrm{Re}}=\frac{R\sqrt{\omega}}{\sqrt{\nu}}, ]
the torque can also be written as
[ \boxed{M\approx1.935,\rho R^4\sqrt{\nu\omega^3}}. ]
This is the total torque for both wetted disk faces under the stated convention.
Relate the Result to the Single-Sided Solution
For one side of the disk, the theoretical viscous torque is
[ M_{\text{one side}}
\frac{\pi}{2}\rho R^4\sqrt{\nu\omega^3}\left|G'(0)\right|, ]
where
[ -G'(0)\approx0.6159. ]
Therefore,
[ M_{\text{one side}} \approx 0.9675,\rho R^4\sqrt{\nu\omega^3}. ]
A disk wetted on both sides has approximately twice this torque:
[ M_{\text{two sides}} \approx 1.935,\rho R^4\sqrt{\nu\omega^3}. ]
This two-sided result is consistent with the coefficient (3.87/\sqrt{\mathrm{Re}}).
Convert Torque to Mechanical Power
Calculate Drive Power
The ideal mechanical power required to maintain rotation is
[ \boxed{P=M\omega}. ]
Using the coefficient form,
[ P=\frac{c_M\rho\omega^3R^5}{2}. ]
This represents the fluid-mechanical power associated with disk torque. The installed motor must also account for drive-train losses, bearings, seals, transmission efficiency, and any additional process loads.
Apply the Method to Pilot Equipment
In rotating membrane separators, contactors, and similar pilot-scale equipment, the calculated torque helps determine whether the selected drive can maintain the required speed.
The calculation should be performed at the most demanding expected condition, including changes in fluid viscosity, density, disk speed, and wetted geometry.
Distinguish Disk Shear from Conduit Friction
Use the Rotating-Disk Model for Disk Torque
The rotating-disk equation describes viscous shear generated by the disk boundary layers. Its governing length scale is the disk radius, leading to
[ \mathrm{Re}=\frac{R^2\omega}{\nu}. ]
Conduit friction factors should not be substituted into this disk-torque calculation.
Use Shape-Specific Friction Factors for Channels
If the pilot plant also contains flow through rectangular channels, annular spaces, or other non-circular passages, pressure-drop calculations require a separate friction-factor model.
For laminar conduit flow, the form is
[ \lambda=\frac{C}{\mathrm{Re}}, ]
where (C) depends on cross-sectional geometry. Representative values are:
- Square duct: (C=57)
- Equilateral triangular duct: (C=53)
- Annular space: (C=96)
- Rectangular duct with a 2:1 width-to-height ratio: (C=62)
- Rectangular duct with a 4:1 width-to-height ratio: (C=73)
These coefficients address pressure loss in the passage, not torque generated by a rotating disk.
Understanding the Trade-offs
Account for Flow Transition
When
[ \mathrm{Re}\approx3\times10^5 ]
or higher, the flow begins transitioning from laminar toward turbulent behavior. The moment coefficient then deviates upward from
[ c_M=\frac{3.87}{\sqrt{\mathrm{Re}}}, ]
so the laminar formula can underpredict torque and motor power.
Avoid Extrapolating the Laminar Formula
The laminar correlation should not be extrapolated indefinitely with increasing speed or disk size. Turbulent torque requires an appropriate turbulent rotating-disk correlation or experimentally measured data.
Check the Actual Wetted Surfaces
The two-sided result assumes that both disk faces are wetted and experience comparable fluid conditions. If one side is dry, shielded, or exposed to a substantially different gap or flow condition, the total torque must be evaluated by summing the contributions from the individual surfaces.
Recognize Geometry and Clearance Effects
The ideal rotating-disk solution assumes a sufficiently open fluid region and a well-defined boundary-layer flow. Nearby stationary walls, narrow gaps, housings, seals, surface roughness, and throughflow can alter the torque substantially.
Making the Right Choice for Your Goal
Use the theoretical result as a baseline, then verify that the geometry and flow regime match the model.
- If your primary focus is calculating laminar disk torque: Compute (\mathrm{Re}=R^2\omega/\nu), evaluate (c_M=3.87/\sqrt{\mathrm{Re}}), and use (M=c_M\rho\omega^2R^5/2) for a disk wetted on both sides.
- If your primary focus is sizing the motor drive: Convert torque to power with (P=M\omega), then include mechanical losses and a margin for transitional or turbulent operation.
- If your primary focus is pressure drop in pilot-plant passages: Use the geometry-specific relation (\lambda=C/\mathrm{Re}) rather than the rotating-disk moment coefficient.
- If your primary focus is operation near or above the laminar limit: Use turbulent or experimentally validated torque data because the laminar relationship will tend to underpredict the required drive load.
With consistent definitions, the rotating-disk method provides a direct theoretical link between fluid properties, operating speed, disk size, torque, and motor power.
Summary Table:
| Item | Key Information |
|---|---|
| Rotational Reynolds number | Re = R^2ω/ν |
| Laminar range | Re < 3 × 10^5 |
| Two-sided moment coefficient | cM = 3.87/√Re |
| Moment coefficient definition | cM = 2M/(ρω^2R^5) |
| Two-sided disk torque | M = 1.935ρR^4√(νω^3) |
| Mechanical power | P = Mω |
| Above the laminar range | Use turbulent correlations or validated experimental data |
| Important corrections | Consider gaps, walls, seals, roughness, throughflow, and unequal wetted surfaces |
Need reliable drive sizing for rotating equipment? Contact LABPARK for practical support with Educational and Vocational Unit Operations Pilot Plants for chemical engineering, bioprocess and biotech, and environmental and water treatment applications. LABPARK can help universities, research institutes, and enterprises evaluate disk torque, motor power, fluid properties, wetted geometry, transitional-flow risks, and equipment clearances so your pilot plant is specified for real operating conditions. Get guidance on selecting and configuring a validated pilot-scale system for teaching, research, process development, and industrial testing.
Related Products
- General Purpose Cosmetics Production Unit Operations Training Pilot Plant
- Multi Pump Fluid Transport Process Piping Unit Operations Training Pilot Plant
- Multi-Functional Drying Educational Unit Operations Pilot Plant
- Fixed-Bed Chemical Reaction and Gas Dust Tar Removal Unit Operations Pilot Plant
- 100L Continuous Loop Hydrogenation Educational Unit Operations Pilot Plant
People Also Ask
- Why Does a Pilot Plant Solver Return a Singular Matrix Error, and How Can You Resolve It?
- How can unit operations pilot plants demonstrate simultaneous removal of light and heavy impurities? Configure a modular setup
- How do steady-state and dynamic simulations complement pilot plants? Validate scale-up and controllability
- How do deviations in estimating latent heat impact pilot plant thermal systems? Avoid hardware mis-sizing.
- Why is the chemical plant startup schedule crucial? De-risk scale-up with pilot plants.